Create accountLogin

Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Not available on handmade.social.
handmade.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
handmade.social is for all handmade artisans to create accounts for their Etsy and other handmade business shops.

Administered by:

Server stats:

37
active users

handmade.social: AboutProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.3.6

#chatgpt

9 posts9 participants0 posts today
Public
Pete Orrall

ChatGPT is a real head scratcher. Today I prompted it for DoD- and NSA-grade Linux security, it gave me some good info for extreme security configurations. Then it asked me if I wanted it as an Ansible playbook.

The result? The 85-line configuration file it provided wouldn't have even passed compliance to a Level 1 CIS Benchmark.

#chatgpt#ai#artificialintelligence
Public
Anthony
Revealed: How the UK tech secretary uses ChatGPT for policy advice
New Scientist has used freedom of information laws to obtain the ChatGPT records of Peter Kyle, the UK's technology secretary, in what is believed to be a world-first use of such legislation
From https://www.newscientist.com/article/2472068-revealed-how-the-uk-tech-secretary-uses-chatgpt-for-policy-advice/
These records show that Kyle asked ChatGPT to explain why the UK’s small and medium business (SMB) community has been so slow to adopt AI. ChatGPT returned a 10-point list of problems hindering adoption, including sections on “Limited Awareness and Understanding”, “Regulatory and Ethical Concerns” and “Lack of Government or Institutional Support”.
Apparently it didn't say "because it's unhelpful and probably harmful to most SMB problems" or "what on earth are you doing asking a computer this you fool?".

#GPT #ChatGPT #AI #UKPol #policy #BadIdeas
New Scientist · Revealed: How the UK tech secretary uses ChatGPT for policy adviceBy Chris Stokel-Walker
Public
Lazarou Monkey Terror 🚀💙🌈

These are not serious people, and they do not understand the technological world they have been voted in to regulate. The Tech Bros will just dangle shiny things in front of these unserious politicians and there goes our Future.

"Oh Chat GPT, which podcasts should I go on? I could ask a human being with a mind, but instead I'll ask Fancy Autocorrect for the most likely answer that I want to hear"

2hago 13.08 GMT Peter Kyle uses ChatGPT for work research, Fol request reveals, as PM says he wants officials to use Al much more In my opening post this morning, about Keir Starmer’s civil service reform speech, I speculated about Al replacing politicians. (See 9.35am.) It was intended as a joke, to lighten the tone at the end of something a bit long and dry, but it turns out that I was more prescient than I realised. Because New Scientist has just revealed that Peter Kyle, the science secretary, consults ChatGPT when he is conducting work research. In his story Chris Stokel-Walker says: 44 This week, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that the UK government should be making far more use of Al in an effort to increase efficiency. “No person’s substantive time should be spent on a task where digital or Al can do it better, quicker and to the same high quality and standard,” he said.
In his story Chris Stokel-Walker says: 44 This week, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that the UK government should be making far more use of Al in an effort to increase efficiency. “No person’s substantive time should be spent on a task where digital or Al can do it better, quicker and to the same high quality and standard,” he said. Now, New Scientist has obtained records of Kyle’s ChatGPT use under the Freedom of Information (Fol) Act, in what is believed to be a world-first test of whether chatbot interactions are subject to such laws. These records show that Kyle asked ChatGPT to explain why the UK’s small and medium business (SMB) community has been so slow to adopt Al. ChatGPT returned a 10-point list of problems hindering adoption, including sections on “Limited Awareness and Understanding”, “Regulatory and Ethical Concerns” and “Lack of Government or Institutional Support”.
Stokel-Walker says Kyle also used ChatGPT to give advice on what podcasts he should appear on to reach an audience appropriate to his ministerial responsibilities, and to define scientific terms like antimatter, quantum and digital inclusion. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology initiatially rejected the Fol request on the grounds that Kyle consulted ChatGPT in a personal capacity as well as in a work capacity. But it responded when the request was revised just to cover work seaches. In his story Stokel-Walker quotes one expert saying he was surprised that the department agreed to release the responses to a ChatGPT question under Fol. Alaywer told New Scientist that, on the basis of this precedent, Google searches could be covered too. But another expert argued that Google searches don’t create new content, whereas a ChatGPT question does. The DSIT told Stokel-Walker that the material Kyle got from ChatGPT was not a substitute for the “comprehensive advice” he received from officials.
#PeterKyle#ChatGPT
Public
Simon Brooke

"#ChatGPT, for instance, incorrectly identified 134 articles, but signaled [sic] a lack of confidence just fifteen times out of its two hundred responses, and never declined to provide an answer. With the exception of #Copilot—which declined more questions than it answered—all of the tools were consistently more likely to provide an incorrect answer than to acknowledge limitations"

#GenerativeAI

cjr.org/tow_center/we-compared

Columbia Journalism ReviewAI Search Has A Citation ProblemWe Compared Eight AI Search Engines. They’re All Bad at Citing News.
Public
Toni Aittoniemi

#OpenAI is teaching #ChatGPT to spew out #MAGA loyalty signals like ”All lives matter” in response to #BlackLivesMatter. ”Avoiding moral authority” in questions like Palestine. Teaching it that ”it’s a complicated question” is the wrong answer to nonsense constructions aimed to discredit a minority

USA is the wrong place to build a machine that will steer the intellectual development of the coming human race

It’ll come on the side of soft eugenics & false equivalencies

techcrunch.com/2025/02/16/open

TechCrunch · OpenAI tries to 'uncensor' ChatGPT | TechCrunchOpenAI is changing how it trains AI models to explicitly embrace "intellectual freedom … no matter how challenging or controversial a topic may be," the
SearchLive feeds
About