handmade.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
handmade.social is for all handmade artisans to create accounts for their Etsy and other handmade business shops.

Server stats:

36
active users

#peerreview

2 posts2 participants0 posts today
UniversityofGroningenLibrary<p>New <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> publication in the spotlight:</p><p>➡️ Intramolecular feedback regulation of the LRRK2 Roc G domain by a LRRK2 kinase-dependent mechanism</p><p>🔗 <a href="https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91083.4" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91083.4</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p>We talked to one of the <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/authors" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>authors</span></a>, Arjan Kortholt from our faculty of <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a> and <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/Engineering" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Engineering</span></a>, about the article, preprints, open <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a>, open access, and <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a> in general.</p><p>Read more on our Open Science <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/Blog" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Blog</span></a>: <a href="https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/blog/open-access-publication-in-the-spotlight-intramolecular-feedback-regulation-of-the-lrrk2-roc-g-do" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">rug.nl/library/open-access/blo</span><span class="invisible">g/open-access-publication-in-the-spotlight-intramolecular-feedback-regulation-of-the-lrrk2-roc-g-do</span></a></p><p><a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/Biochemistry" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Biochemistry</span></a> <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/Biology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Biology</span></a> <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/OpenData" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenData</span></a></p><p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@ScienceNewsroom_UG" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>ScienceNewsroom_UG</span></a></span></p>
Calishat<p><a href="https://researchbuzz.masto.host/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://researchbuzz.masto.host/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://researchbuzz.masto.host/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a> </p><p>'I do not have definitive proof the peer review of my manuscript was AI-generated. But the similarities between the comments left by the peer reviewer, and the output from the AI models was striking.</p><p>AI models make research faster, easier and more accessible. However, their implementation as a tool to assist in peer review requires careful oversight, with current guidance on AI use in peer review being mixed, and its effectiveness unclear.'</p><p><a href="https://theconversation.com/vague-confusing-and-did-nothing-to-improve-my-work-how-ai-can-undermine-peer-review-251040" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">theconversation.com/vague-conf</span><span class="invisible">using-and-did-nothing-to-improve-my-work-how-ai-can-undermine-peer-review-251040</span></a></p>
Benjamin Carr, Ph.D. 👨🏻‍💻🧬<p>Pioneering <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/CERN" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CERN</span></a> scheme will pay publishers more if they hit <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/openscience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>openscience</span></a> targets<br><a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/Physics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Physics</span></a> funder will provide financial incentives to encourage practices such as data sharing and transparent <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/peerreview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>peerreview</span></a>.<br>Journals publish work from field openly and at no cost to authors, in exchange for bulk payments. Under initiative, CERN will pay more to publishers that adopt polices such as public or open peer review and linking research to data sets, and less to those that don't.<br><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00183-3" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nature.com/articles/d41586-025</span><span class="invisible">-00183-3</span></a></p>
eLife<p>2/ The 18-month programme begins with 10 months of training in <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a>, <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a>, science communication, community engagement, research <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/reproducibility" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>reproducibility</span></a>, and effective leadership, alongside fostering an inclusive research culture.</p>
PrivacyDigest<p><a href="https://mas.to/tags/OpenAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAI</span></a> bans <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Chinese" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Chinese</span></a> accounts using <a href="https://mas.to/tags/ChatGPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ChatGPT</span></a> to edit code for social media <a href="https://mas.to/tags/surveillance" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>surveillance</span></a></p><p>The campaign, which OpenAI calls <a href="https://mas.to/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a>, saw the group prompt ChatGPT to generate sales pitches for a program those documents suggest was designed to monitor anti-Chinese sentiment on X, <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Facebook" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Facebook</span></a> , <a href="https://mas.to/tags/YouTube" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>YouTube</span></a> , <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Instagram" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Instagram</span></a> and other platforms.<br>&gt; BTW, this also confirms they’re analyzing what the rest of us are using their platform for<br><a href="https://mas.to/tags/privacy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>privacy</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/china" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>china</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/security" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>security</span></a></p><p><a href="https://www.engadget.com/ai/openai-bans-chinese-accounts-using-chatgpt-to-edit-code-for-social-media-surveillance-230451036.html?guccounter=1&amp;guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly90ZWNoLnNsYXNoZG90Lm9yZy8&amp;guce_referrer_sig=AQAAACJLkx1K-ypkLDq7k_PCF3GuJFnOhnoNJSNbMzvMULEKQkvF-8KP_R2oxoqZFz9qqRMmr015OdiMfWDp0EAW4O88jKfi8yfjzvKi6DSaj4WTUJk2ICzf_ONg7IVFIaI-BMCTxm051VXC2v428lxyiLSzgkAIX3VT4Moj5Zh1i7Sy" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">engadget.com/ai/openai-bans-ch</span><span class="invisible">inese-accounts-using-chatgpt-to-edit-code-for-social-media-surveillance-230451036.html?guccounter=1&amp;guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly90ZWNoLnNsYXNoZG90Lm9yZy8&amp;guce_referrer_sig=AQAAACJLkx1K-ypkLDq7k_PCF3GuJFnOhnoNJSNbMzvMULEKQkvF-8KP_R2oxoqZFz9qqRMmr015OdiMfWDp0EAW4O88jKfi8yfjzvKi6DSaj4WTUJk2ICzf_ONg7IVFIaI-BMCTxm051VXC2v428lxyiLSzgkAIX3VT4Moj5Zh1i7Sy</span></a></p>
Mx Verda<p>ooooh<br>Mah Felloh Gamers</p><p><a href="https://www.thecanary.co/discovery/sport-and-gaming/2025/01/21/play-offline-games/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">thecanary.co/discovery/sport-a</span><span class="invisible">nd-gaming/2025/01/21/play-offline-games/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/game" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>game</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/gaming" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>gaming</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/RetroGaming" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>RetroGaming</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/gamer" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>gamer</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/gamers" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>gamers</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/over30gamers" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>over30gamers</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/nerd" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>nerd</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/nerds" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>nerds</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/geek" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>geek</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/geeks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>geeks</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/videoGame" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>videoGame</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/videoGames" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>videoGames</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/videoGaming" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>videoGaming</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/review" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>review</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/peer_reviewer" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>peer_reviewer</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/guide" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>guide</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/tip" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>tip</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/tips" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>tips</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/advice" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>advice</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/advisory" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>advisory</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/idea" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>idea</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/ideas" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ideas</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/framework" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>framework</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/infrastructure" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>infrastructure</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/outline" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>outline</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/versioning" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>versioning</span></a></p>
PREreview<p>We’ve decided to leave X (Twitter). We think that the benefits of being on X are now outweighed by the negatives, and we want to strategically use our resources to promote open scholarship and peer review on other platforms. 🧵 (1/5)</p><p><a href="https://mas.to/tags/OpenScholarship" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScholarship</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/OpenResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenResearch</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a></p>
Mark Dingemanse<p>How I reject most Elsevier review requests <a href="https://ideophone.org/how-i-reject-most-elsevier-review-requests/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">ideophone.org/how-i-reject-mos</span><span class="invisible">t-elsevier-review-requests/</span></a></p><p>For years now, I have responded to review requests from Elsevier journals with a friendly explanation of why I cannot in good conscience devote my free labour to their for-profit venture. I always include an out: make some work in the same journal available in open access. Somehow they always find this isn't possible 🤷 </p><p><a href="https://scholar.social/tags/academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>academia</span></a> <a href="https://scholar.social/tags/AcademicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicChatter</span></a> <a href="https://scholar.social/tags/peerreview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>peerreview</span></a></p>
Daniele de Rigo<p>7/</p><p>The authors highlight [4] how "questionable and potentially manipulative <a href="https://hostux.social/tags/GPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GPT</span></a>-fabricated papers permeate the <a href="https://hostux.social/tags/research" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>research</span></a> infrastructure and are likely to become a widespread phenomenon."</p><p>Their findings appear to "underline that the risk of <a href="https://hostux.social/tags/fake" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>fake</span></a> scientific papers being used to maliciously manipulate evidence [...] must be taken seriously.</p><p>Manipulation may involve [...] explicit scientific claims, or the concealment of errors in studies so that they are difficult to detect in <a href="https://hostux.social/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a>"</p>
Margaret Gold<p>My <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.cwts.nl/@cwts" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>cwts</span></a></span> colleague <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.cwts.nl/@LudoWaltman" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>LudoWaltman</span></a></span> has co-written a great piece on <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://threads.net/@theconversationdotcom/" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>theconversationdotcom</span></a></span> about how the peer review system is broken - I can vouch for most of the experiences describe therein!! <a href="https://theconversation.com/the-peer-review-system-no-longer-works-to-guarantee-academic-rigour-a-different-approach-is-needed-244092" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">theconversation.com/the-peer-r</span><span class="invisible">eview-system-no-longer-works-to-guarantee-academic-rigour-a-different-approach-is-needed-244092</span></a> <br><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a><br><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a></p>
Benjamin Geer<p>Published in an Elsevier journal.</p><p>Edit: at first I thought this must be a prank played on the editors, but as several people have pointed out in the replies, you can read the text as a satire of real problems in the medical profession, so maybe the editors were in on the joke.</p><p><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110139" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.1</span><span class="invisible">10139</span></a></p><p><a href="https://piaille.fr/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://piaille.fr/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a> <a href="https://piaille.fr/tags/AcademicPublishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicPublishing</span></a></p>
petersuber<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://bird.makeup/users/a_m_mastroianni" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>a_m_mastroianni</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/academicchatter" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>academicchatter</span></a></span> </p><p>I also recommend Mastroianni's Dec 2022 paper on <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a> (which I didn't run into until just now).<br><a href="https://www.experimental-history.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">experimental-history.com/p/the</span><span class="invisible">-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review</span></a></p><p>I esp recommend the three reasons he gives to support his thesis that "if you look at what scientists actually do, it’s clear they don’t think peer review really matters."</p>
AzureCerulean<p>IF providing peer reviewed data and facts makes me a troll, I'll be a troll every day until I die!</p><p>See link here for further questions:<br><a href="https://4bear.com/@AzureCerulean/111720509569669962" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">4bear.com/@AzureCerulean/11172</span><span class="invisible">0509569669962</span></a></p><p><a href="https://4bear.com/tags/FACTS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FACTS</span></a> <a href="https://4bear.com/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a> <a href="https://4bear.com/tags/Troll" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Troll</span></a></p>
eicker.news tech news<p>»<a href="https://eicker.news/tags/ChatGPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ChatGPT</span></a> is transforming <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/peerreview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>peerreview</span></a> — how can we use it responsibly? At major <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/computerscience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>computerscience</span></a> publication venues, up to 17% of the <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/peerreviews" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>peerreviews</span></a> are now written by <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/artificialintelligence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>artificialintelligence</span></a>.« <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03588-8?eicker.news" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nature.com/articles/d41586-024</span><span class="invisible">-03588-8?eicker.news</span></a> <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/tech" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>tech</span></a> <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/media" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>media</span></a></p>
Dave nλ=2dsinθ<p>Absolute shots fired.</p><p>From: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360319924043957" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">sciencedirect.com/science/arti</span><span class="invisible">cle/abs/pii/S0360319924043957</span></a></p><p><a href="https://xtaldave.net/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a> <a href="https://xtaldave.net/tags/Academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Academia</span></a> <a href="https://xtaldave.net/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a> <a href="https://xtaldave.net/tags/Research" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Research</span></a></p>
Michael Marek<p>I got notification today that a prestigious scholarly journal article for which I did multiple rounds of review, starting in February, has (finally) been approved for publication.</p><p>Most of my feedback both times was structure or terminology in the article, not fundamental issues of research design and implementation. The other reviewer(s) must have taken forever to do their reviews to have it take this long for acceptance.</p><p>Of course, in double-blind review, I cannot identify the journal or the articles.</p><p>(Yes, I still do scholarly work in retirement.)</p><p><a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>academia</span></a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/Research" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Research</span></a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/Writing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Writing</span></a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a></p>
Stefano Zacchiroli<p><a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/peerreview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>peerreview</span></a> is doing great: « As strongly requested by the reviewers, here we cite some references [[35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47]] although they are completely irrelevant to the present work. » from the last paragraph in the introduction of <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319924043957" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">sciencedirect.com/science/arti</span><span class="invisible">cle/pii/S0360319924043957</span></a></p><p>h/t <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://masto.ai/@rfc1149" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>rfc1149</span></a></span></p>
RenkeSiems<p><a href="https://openbiblio.social/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a> - the acid test of quality in science.</p><p>(Q: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360319924043957" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">sciencedirect.com/science/arti</span><span class="invisible">cle/abs/pii/S0360319924043957</span></a>)</p>
petersuber<p>Update. New study: "At major computer-science publication venues, up to 17% of the peer reviews are now written by artificial intelligence. We need guidelines before things get out of hand."<br><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03588-8" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nature.com/articles/d41586-024</span><span class="invisible">-03588-8</span></a> </p><p>h/t <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://openbiblio.social/@bachtasaar" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>bachtasaar</span></a></span></p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/LLMs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>LLMs</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>Update. Researchers asked <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ChatGPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ChatGPT</span></a> and human experts to <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a> the same article, and then compared their reviews.<br><a href="https://doi.org/10.59249/SKDH9286" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">doi.org/10.59249/SKDH9286</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p>They find "compelling evidence [for] ChatGPT’s performance…[Its] critical analyses aligned with those of human reviewers…[It] exhibited commendable capability in identifying methodological flaws, articulating insightful feedback on theoretical frameworks, and gauging the overall contribution of the articles to their…fields."</p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/LLMs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>LLMs</span></a></p>