handmade.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
handmade.social is for all handmade artisans to create accounts for their Etsy and other handmade business shops.

Server stats:

36
active users

#authoritarian

6 posts6 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread

Shakedown #Politics, Sabotage, Self-Enrichment: How to Talk About #Trump & Musk's Authoritarian Activities
lucid.substack.com/p/shakedown

" #Trump & #Musk are not merely creating another #autocracy along the lines of #Hungary or #Turkey, with inspiration from South African #apartheid and the #JimCrow South. They are innovating the #authoritarian playbook with their power-sharing agreement and their chainsaw & wrecking-ball tactics."

Ann Arbor,MI…There you are!
Remnants of our foundation…roots!
I was proud that it grounded me.
#HashBash & all.

We stand up for working families!
That’s who our parents & gparents were…
If they were lucky!

I’m looking at you…Uof〽️!
Broke my 💔
Erasing your #history …you’re very soul…
Why? Greed?
Compliance is DEFEAT?

Cowards…or Champions?
You choose.

#dei #trump #authoritarian #oligarchy

#postalworkers rally in #annarbor against proposed nationwide restructuring
share.newsbreak.com/c8cy6qhf?s

Postal workers rally in Ann Arbor against proposed nationwide restructuring
MLive · Postal workers rally in Ann Arbor against proposed nationwide restructuring - NewsBreakBy Justin Engel

As the #USA sinks towards a dystopian swamp, I am reminded that we always mandated (did not just suggest) that people travelling to the US on occasional business took ‘clean' telephones and laptops with them, we actually retained a small recycled stock for that purpose. And that began more than 8 years ago. We do not do business that requires any travel to the USA any more. Isolation beckons for the USA.

theguardian.com/us-news/2025/m

The Guardian · French scientist denied US entry after phone messages critical of Trump foundBy Robert Mackey

A post by @rbreich on another platform:

Friends,

After a federal judge pressed the Trump administration to provide evidence by 5 pm yesterday about whether the White House had violated the court’s order in deporting migrants with little to no due process, so-called border czar Tom Homan said that the flights would continue regardless. “We’re not stopping,” he said. “I don’t care what the judges think.”

In our system, judges don’t just “think.” They have the final say, unless their rulings are appealed to the Supreme Court, in which case the high court’s majority has the final final say.

Yesterday afternoon, it became apparent that Trump’s Justice Department shares Homan’s odd view of our judicial system. DOJ lawyers filed papers telling the judge that the administration would not provide any further information about the deportation flights, and that the court should vacate the hearing.

Then, speaking on Fox News, Attorney General Pam Bondi criticized the judge, saying “What he’s done is an intrusion on the president’s authority.”

What’s going on here?
A very dangerous game.

On Sunday night, Trump told reporters that a federal judge in California who ordered the administration to rehire thousands of fired probationary workers was “putting himself in the position of the president of the United States, who was elected by close to 80 million votes.”

Excuse me? In our system of government, courts pass judgment on actions of a president and the executive branch. Courts don’t put themselves in the “position” of a president. They act as the Constitution empowers them to act — as a co-equal branch of government.

If the executive branch doesn’t agree with what a lower-court judge decides, it can appeal to a higher court and ultimately to the Supreme Court.

Trump isn’t the only one to make this unconstitutional claim. In early February, Trump’s vice president, JD Vance, declared that “judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.” It was an odd statement coming from someone who has studied at one of America’s preeminent law schools — and it was logically absurd, since it’s up to judges (and eventually the Supreme Court’s justices) to determine a president’s “legitimate power.”

Let’s be clear. Trump has openly violated numerous laws and constitutional provisions — such as ending birthright citizenship; giving associates of Elon Musk’s government-slashing effort access to a sensitive Treasury Department system; transferring transgender female inmates to male prisons; placing thousands of U.S. Agency for International Development employees on leave; and effectively dismantling USAID and folding it into the State Department.

In response, federal judges have temporarily barred a slew of Trump orders from taking effect.

But not until now has Trump or his regime so blatantly refused to follow a judge’s order.

What happens when this or another lower-court ruling goes to the Supreme Court, and the high court rules against Trump?

Vance has said that if this occurs, Trump should “stand before the country like Andrew Jackson did and say, ‘The chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.’”

Never mind that the quote attributed to Jackson is, as one scholar has noted, “probably apocryphal.” It’s heard more and more from Trump appointees these days, as exemplified by Homan’s remark this morning and this afternoon’s Justice Department filing.

Trump’s appointments in his second term are having the opposite effect of his first-term appointees. In his first term, they restrained him somewhat. Recall that the Justice Department’s top brass threatened to resign en masse if he appointed as attorney general the one assistant attorney general who was prepared to sell his soul to Trump and say the 2020 election was stolen from him.

This time, his appointees are magnifying his worst instincts. Rather than act as guardrails, they are egging Trump on.

Many people wonder if we’re in a “constitutional crisis.” Definitions of that phrase vary considerably, as do opinions about whether we’re in one now.

My worry is that Trump is surrounded by extremist anti-democracy nihilists, including his vice president, who are encouraging him to defy the Supreme Court.

If and when he does, we’ll be in a constitutional crisis that should cause every American to take to the streets.

What do you think?

We’re in the midst of #authoritarian takeover of the US govt. It’s been coming and coming, and not everybody is prepared to read it that way. The characters regarded as people to emulate, like #Orban, #Putin all indicate strategy is to create an illiberal #democracy or an authoritarian democracy or a strongman democracy. You neutralize the branches of #government; you neutralize the media; you neutralize universities, and you’re on your way. #trump #maga chronicle.com/article/were-in-

Employees at #VoiceOfAmerica were placed on paid leave on Saturday & funding for 2 US #news services that broadcast to #authoritarian regimes was slashed, one day after #Trump signed an #ExecutiveOrder gutting the govt-funded #media outlets' parent & 6 other #FederalAgencies.

#VOA #FourthEstate #FreePress #journalism #censorship #propaganda #trumpaganda
reuters.com/business/media-tel

Replied in thread

Trump & Musk's Power-Sharing Agreement Innovates the #Authoritarian Playbook

The Novel Power-Partition Opens New Horizons of #Corruption
lucid.substack.com/p/trump-and

" #Trump has a novel power-sharing arrangement w/an unelected private citizen who is essentially executing a #HostileTakeover of the US #government to capture #data... & use our country as a laboratory for a new form of #authoritarian techno-governance that requires the wrecking of #Democracy"

#Musk#Tech#Coup

"Even longtime Republican hawks on Capitol Hill, stunned by President Trump's revisionist history that Ukraine is to blame for its invasion by Russia, and his Oval Office blowup at President Volodymyr Zelensky, have either muzzled themselves, tiptoed up to criticism without naming Mr. Trump or completely reversed their positions.

More than six weeks into the second Trump administration, there is a chill spreading over political debate in Washington and beyond.

People on both sides of the aisle who would normally be part of the public dialogue about the big issues of the day say they are intimidated by the prospect of online attacks from Mr. Trump and Elon Musk, concerned about harm to their companies and frightened for the safety of their families. Politicians fear banishment by a party remade in Mr. Trump's image and the prospect of primary opponents financed by Mr. Musk, the president's all-powerful partner and the world's richest man."

nytimes.com/2025/03/06/us/poli

The New York Times · Fearing Retribution, Trump Critics Muzzle ThemselvesBy Elisabeth Bumiller

Trump likes what Putin does - Bernie Sanders in exclusive interview

US Senator #Bernie Sanders shares his concerns about #Trump’s growing alignment with #Russia & other #authoritarian #regimes, what a possible U.S.-Russia alliance would mean for American people, role of #billionaires like #Musk in shaping domestic & international political discourse, & why defending #Ukraine is crucial for future of global democracy

kyivindependent.com/us-senator

The Kyiv Independent · ‘Trump likes what Putin does,' Bernie Sanders says in exclusive interviewBy Kate Tsurkan

Trump says he ‘can’t believe’ he called Zelensky ‘dictator’ at briefing with UK PM Keir Starmer at White House

"Did I say that? I can’t believe I would say that," Trump replied when asked if he still considers Zelensky a dictator

Trump referred to #Zelensky as “dictator without elections” in #TruthSocial post on Feb. 19 falsely accusing him of refusing to hold elections & repeating #Kremlin narrative

kyivindependent.com/trump-says

The Kyiv Independent · Trump says he 'can't believe' he called Zelensky 'dictator'"Did I say that? I can't believe I would say that," U.S. President Donald Trump responded when asked whether he still considers President Volodymyr Zelensky a "dictator."