handmade.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
handmade.social is for all handmade artisans to create accounts for their Etsy and other handmade business shops.

Server stats:

36
active users

#john

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Schemes for Privatizing Freddie and Fannie

#John #Paulson, the hedge fund billionaire, 🔸could score big if the federal government’s housing finance companies, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, are privatized.

He and #Bill #Ackman of Pershing Square Holdings,
another supporter of Mr. Trump’s,
each purchased stakes in Fannie and Freddie, 🔸which the federal government spent $187 billion to bail out in 2008.

There is no formal public accounting of just how many preferred shares Mr. Paulson still controls, and a spokesman for Mr. Paulson declined to discuss the matter.

Mr. Ackman’s investment in Fannie Mae common stock alone included 115.5 million shares, or 10 percent of the total.

Under the new Trump administration, John Paulson, the hedge fund billionaire, could cash out of his investment in the federal government’s housing finance outfits, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

⭐️What is clear is that Freddie and Fannie stocks surged at least 140 percent since Mr. Trump was elected,
a hint of profits that could soon be secured if the privatization goes ahead.

⚠️Advisers and former aides to Mr. Trump have already predicted that the companies are likely to go private during his new term,
💥although it might require bypassing approval by Congress.

Mr. Paulson declined requests to comment. In an interview with Bloomberg Television in September, he agreed the time had come for the federal government to unload Fannie and Freddie.

“They are now in a position where they’re fairly well capitalized,” Mr. Paulson said, “which would make privatization logical

nytimes.com/2024/11/17/us/poli

The New York Times · Trump Boosters Expect Big Returns on Their Investment: ‘The Shackles Are Off’By Eric Lipton

A key ally to former President Donald Trump detailed plans to 🆘 deploy the military in response to domestic unrest,
💥defund the Environmental Protection Agency
and ⚠️ put career civil servants “in trauma”
in a series of previously unreported speeches that provide a sweeping vision for a second Trump term.

In private speeches delivered in 2023 and 2024, #Russell #Vought, who served as Trump’s director of the Office of Management and Budget, described his work crafting legal justifications so that military leaders or government lawyers would not stop Trump’s executive actions.

He said the plans are a response to a “Marxist takeover” of the country; likened the moment to 1776 and 1860, when the country was at war or on the brink of it;
and said the timing of Trump’s candidacy was a “gift of God.”

Vought does not hide his agenda or shy away from using extreme rhetoric in public.

But the apocalyptic tone and hard-line policy prescriptions in the two private speeches go further than his earlier pronouncements.

As OMB director, Vought sought to use Trump’s 2020 “#ScheduleF” executive order to strip away job protections for nonpartisan government workers.

But he has never spoken in such pointed terms about demoralizing federal workers to the point that they don’t want to do their jobs.

He has spoken in broad terms about undercutting independent agencies but never spelled out sweeping plans to defund the EPA and other federal agencies.

Vought’s plans track closely with Trump’s campaign rhetoric about using the military against domestic protesters
or what Trump has called the “enemy within.”

Trump’s desire to use the military on U.S. soil recently prompted his longest-serving chief of staff, retired Marine Gen. #John #Kelly, to speak out,
saying Trump “certainly prefers the dictator approach to government.”

Other policies mentioned by Vought dovetail with Trump’s plans,
such as embracing a wartime footing on the southern border
and rolling back transgender rights.

Agenda 47, the campaign’s policy blueprint, calls for revoking President Joe Biden’s order expanding gender-affirming care for transgender people;

Vought uses even more extreme language, decrying the “transgender sewage that’s being pumped into our schools and institutions”
and referring to gender-affirming care as “chemical castration.”

Since leaving government, Vought has reportedly remained a close ally of the former president.

Speaking in July to undercover journalists posing as relatives of a potential donor, Vought said Trump had “blessed” the Center for Renewing America and was “very supportive of what we do,” CNN reported.

propublica.org/article/video-d

ProPublica“Put Them in Trauma”: Inside a Key MAGA Leader’s Plans for a New Trump Agenda
More from ProPublica
Replied in thread

The ex-President arrived with his son Eric,
stopping to shake hands and exchange pleasantries with each of the approximately two dozen guests,
a “AAA list” of the G.O.P.’s top funders,
as #John #Catsimatidis, the billionaire supermarket owner, put it.

Such events, another attendee told me, often feel like a birthday dinner for the host,
except that “there’s a lot of money being given to someone who isn’t the host
—making Donald Trump the birthday boy, so to speak.”

Trump was seated at the head table, between #Fanjul
—a major Republican donor going back to the early nineties
—and #Stephen #Schwarzman,
the C.E.O. of Blackstone, the world’s largest private-equity fund,
who had endorsed Trump the previous Friday.

Securing the support of Schwarzman was a coup for the Trump campaign.

In 2022, he had said that he would not back the former President again,
because it was time for “a new generation of leaders,”
and, during the primaries, he had given $2 million in support of Chris Christie,
the former New Jersey governor,
who had repeatedly called Trump “unfit to be President.”

In a statement explaining the reversal, Schwarzman said that Biden’s “economic, immigration and foreign policies” were “taking the country in the wrong direction.”

At the dinner, Trump reprised his public rant about the “biased” legal proceedings brought against him,
but an attendee who spoke with me was struck by how “calm and confident” Trump seemed for someone facing prison time.

“He has this very strong internal capability to push those things aside and still feel good about things,” the attendee said.

At the end of the evening, Trump went around the room and solicited opinions on whom he should pick for his running mate.

Haley, Scott, and Doug Burgum, the governor of North Dakota and a wealthy businessman, were mentioned;
-- a couple of the attendees expressed a preference for J. D. Vance,
the young populist senator from Ohio, whom Trump would ultimately choose.

The donors appeared to relish the chance to help select a Vice-Presidential candidate.

“I’ve never seen anything like it,” the attendee marvelled.
🔸Trump raised about $50 million at the event.

Continued thread

During this year's Republican primaries, Peltz gave $100,000 to a super pac supporting Tim Scott,
the South Carolina senator,
but Scott dropped out before a single G.O.P. vote was cast.

By the time of Peltz’s dinner, it was clear that Trump would secure the Republican nomination for an unprecedented third consecutive election.

Peltz, who was no longer on speaking terms with the ex-President, opened the discussion with a blunt assessment of the race.

🔥“I don’t like Donald Trump,” an attendee recalled Peltz saying.

“He’s a terrible human being, but our country’s in a bad place, and we can’t afford Joe Biden.”

So, Peltz concluded, however much they might dislike it, ❌“we’ve all got to throw our support behind him.”

Some of Peltz’s guests remained skeptical,
holding to the view, as the attendee put it, that
“Trump’s a terrible person
—I’m going to focus on the Senate.”

Most of the donors, however, adopted a more pragmatic approach to the ex-President.

Many of them had been granted significant access to the White House during his four years in office.

Some were expected to be considered for senior roles in a second term:

Trump has personally floated the name of the hedge-fund tycoon #John #Paulson, for instance, as a potential Secretary of the Treasury, touting him as
💥“a money machine.”

“They know how transactional he is,” the attendee told me.

“They’re hoping to have some influence over the course of appointments and therefore the direction of his Administration.”

A few of Peltz’s guests were all in.
#Steve #Wynn, the Las Vegas gambling titan, has known Trump for decades;

his wife, #Andrea #Hissom, is close to the former First Lady, Melania, and the two couples have spent time together in Palm Beach.

And then there was #Elon #Musk, the world’s richest man, who had reportedly got to know Peltz through Peltz’s son #Diesel, a tech entrepreneur.

At the time, Musk had said that he would NOT back a candidate in the Presidential race.

♦️By the fall, he would enthusiastically endorse Trump, spending $75 million to support him through a new super pac,
-- and spreading pro-Trump lies and conspiracy theories on his social-media platform, X.

Trump, the richest man ever to serve in the White House, is himself a billionaire,
though the extent of his wealth has long been in question.

(As of mid-October, with stock in Trump’s social-media venture, Truth Social, experiencing a pre-election bounce, Forbes estimated his net worth at about $5.5 billion.)

In 2016, Trump hardly bothered to court big donors.

He was shunned by much of the G.O.P. élite and largely self-funded his Republican primary campaign.

He lambasted Jeb Bush, the brother and son of Presidents, as a tool of the moneyed class.

👉“Super pacs are a disaster,” Trump said in a 2016 debate.
“They’re a scam. They cause dishonesty.
And you’d better get rid of them, because they are causing a lot of bad decisions to be made by some very good people.”

⚠️But in 2020, as an incumbent President, Trump embraced super pacs and their funders.

The two main super pacs supporting his campaign raised
💥$255 million on his behalf that year;

his total fund-raising came to more than
💥 $1 billion.

However, Biden, like Hillary Clinton four years earlier, raised even more than Trump,
bringing over-all spending in the 2020 Presidential race to a record🔥 $5.7 billion.

Two men recognized and exploited the anti-democratic loopholes within America’s rickety democracy
-- in order to deliver Republicans victories that they could never win at the ballot box.

Now their willfully minoritarian creations threaten the very essence of a representative democracy:

if Donald #Trump, rightwing courts, #gerrymandered state legislatures and an extreme Republican #caucus in the US House of Representatives create constitutional #chaos over the certification of this presidential election, 👉two men cleared the path.

The single-minded determination of #Leonard #Leo built a conservative supermajority on the US #supreme #court and ♦️stacked lower and state courts with Republican #ideologues that have pushed the nation to the right via the least accountable branch of government.

#Chris #Jankowski masterminded the partisan #gerrymanders that ♦️tilted state legislatures and congressional delegations across the south and the purple midwest toward extreme Republicans,
♦️ended Barack Obama’s second term before it started, and ♦️rendered elections in Wisconsinand North Carolina all but meaningless over the last decade and a half.

Leo and Jankowski understood, separately, that the courts and state legislatures were undervalued and often undefended targets for a deliberate strategy aimed at capturing important levers of power that sometimes float under the radar.

They could be Moneyball-ed, to borrow the term Michael Lewis used in his book about how the Oakland A’s made an end-run around large-market teams by understanding value that their opponents overlooked.

What Leo and Jankowski built separately would soon reinforce the other’s creation (with, of course, crucial assists from chief justice #John #Roberts), tightening the knots around meaningful elections, pushing policy to the extreme right and 💥making it nearly impossible for voters to do anything about it

theguardian.com/commentisfree/

The Guardian · Two men have re-engineered the US electoral system in favor of RepublicansBy Guardian staff reporter
Continued thread

Backed by a cabal of wealthy conservative patrons like industrialist #David #Koch,
banker #Richard #Mellon #Scaife,
and the devout Catholic entrepreneur #Frank #Hanna,
the Federalist Society under Leo became a breeding ground for conservative judges who were recruited at law school,
groomed through the society’s program of events and talks,
and then bound together through their careers.

“The key was to figure out how to develop what I call a ‘pipeline’
— basically, where you recruit students in law school,
you get them through law school,
they come out of law school,
and then you find ways of continuing to involve them in legal policy,” Leo later explained.

In 2005, the Federalist Society began openly advocating for #John #Roberts
— a former member
— to be nominated to fill a vacant seat at the Supreme Court,
the first time it had campaigned publicly for a particular candidate.

A few months later, its sway had grown so much that it torpedoed President George W. Bush’s own preferred candidate for another vacant seat on the Supreme Court
#Harriet #Miers, a judge and close friend of the president who wasn’t a member of the Federalist Society
— and pressured him to nominate #Samuel #Alito, one of its members, in her place.

Leo worked closely with the "Judicial Confirmation Network",
a new nonprofit organization set up using funds from #Robin #Arkley, a California businessman known as the
“foreclosure king,” who had made billions buying up mortgages of people in financial difficulties.

The idea for #JCN had been hatched at a dinner in Washington attended by Leo and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia shortly after Bush’s reelection in late 2004.

JCN spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on radio and online advertisement to shape public opinion.

It was run by #Neil and #Ann #Corkery, a couple who had been members of #Opus #Dei since at least the eighties.

Neil had been a critical figure in getting a new residence for male, celibate members of the Catholic movement built in Reston, Virginia.

“Opus Dei members preach their faith through their work as well as the friendships they develop,” Ann explained.

She and her husband would later preach their faith by becoming central figures in a series of nonprofits that would channel dark money for Leo’s efforts.

J D #Vance’s speech at the Republican National Convention was all but indistinguishable from the claims of the #John #Birch #Society in the 1970s.

Senior Birch leader #Gary #Allen (father of Axios executive editor Michael Allen) wrote in his 1971 book, "None Dare Call It Conspiracy", that
a group he called the “#Insiders,” consisting of “power-seeking billionaires,”
sought to ➡️ squeeze the middle class “to death by a vise.”

This would be done by pursuing a strategy of tension:

the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations would channel money to Students for a Democratic Society, the Black Panthers, and a whole sordid host of New Left organizations to stir up trouble in the streets
“while the Limousine Liberals at the top in New York and Washington are Socializing us.
WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A DICTATORSHIP OF THE ELITE DISGUISED AS THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLETARIAT.”

The hidden hand of the Insiders, he said, lay behind the radical tumult of the late 1960s and early 1970s, all at the expense of the American middle class.

Crucially, although "None Dare Call It Conspiracy" included anti-capitalist elements,
it was still profoundly hostile to socialism and communism,
-- with Allen at one point arguing that both ideologies were simply different terms for monopoly capitalism.

Bircherite producerism did not prevail in the 1970s,
either within the contested space of American right-wing politics or national policy.
🔸“Woke capital” is used essentially in the same way as “the Insiders,”
🔸and not just by J. D. Vance.
#Andy #Olivastro, the director of coalition relations at #Heritage, defined it as “a top-down anti-democratic movement . . . on the part of some of the biggest and most important names in American business . . . to change the definition of capitalism itself.”
The only major distinction between “woke capitalism” and the Insiders is that Allen insisted that the core goal of the conspiracy was power as such,
whereas “woke capital” is more interested in ensuring liberal and left-wing social policy.
Nonetheless, today’s right-wing critics of neoliberalism are fundamentally embedded in the same political tradition.
Thankfully, Vance, one of the most unpopular vice-presidential candidates of the past fifty years, is a poor messenger for his Bircherite economic politics.
jacobin.com/2024/07/vance-trum

jacobin.comJ. D. Vance Is Summoning the John Birch SocietyFar from a novel form of populism, J. D. Vance’s appeals are indistinguishable from the economic vision of the 1970s John Birch Society.