Claire McCaskill on #MSNBC about #CoryBooker s speech is the most feel good nutritious warm fuzzy news maybe I have ever heard.
Claire McCaskill on #MSNBC about #CoryBooker s speech is the most feel good nutritious warm fuzzy news maybe I have ever heard.
@weit_im_westen @wrzlbrnft #MSNBC mutmasst, Trump würde die USA ganz nach seinem Vorbild Putin umbauen.
Und wenn man alle Ereignisse der letzten Wochen zusammenfasst, sind die Weichen längst gelegt.
Das Heimatschutzministerium ist auch nicht neutral besetzt. Es soll bis zum 20. April einen Vorwand liefern für den insurrection act.
Bis dahin ist auch laut Trump der Scheinwaffenstillstand datiert.
Hey, wir haben bis Januar alle gedacht, ganz so schlimm wird es nicht kommen, dann kamen die
@cobalt123 It was on the Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell on #msnbc
Promoting to @teslatakedown:
“Hey #TeslaTakeDown community, y'all caught @maddow.msnbc.com's attention! Keep the pressure on! Keep protesting, keep dancing, keep encouraging our neighbors to get out there and fight back!”
https://bsky.app/profile/teslatakedown.com/post/3lkordkqn3k2z
Maddow segment: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:bono5gae7m6r3qpfxomshwbd/post/3lkoptfid3k2c
Okay, so given Trump's move to undo pardons granted by outgoing US President Joe Biden so he can target DoJ officials who prosecuted him for real crimes he actually committed, and the above-mentioned pattern of Trump's aggrieved fascist ranting transmuting into official, state-recognized reality, while serving to justify oppressive action by the regime, what are we to make of Trump declaring that media outlets that report on him critically, including named organizations MSNBC and CNN, are "illegal" during that same speech at the US Department of Justice? Well, I think for starters it's safe to assume that none of this means *anything* good.
Donald Trump Claims MSNBC And CNN Are ‘Illegal’ In DOJ Speech
"The president gave a speech Friday at the Justice Department railing against news outlets he says have unfairly targeted him.
Trump singled out CNN and MSNBC, which he called “MSNDC,” claiming those outlets “literally write 97.6% bad about me” and are “political arms of the Democrat Party.”
He added, “In my opinion, they’re really corrupt and they’re illegal, what they do is illegal.”
Trump then argued that media organizations that report negative things about him “are really no different than a highly paid political operative,” insisting, “it has to stop, it has to be illegal” because “it’s influencing judges and it’s really, eh, changing law, and it just cannot be legal.”
He additionally claimed that news outlets cover him negatively “in total coordination with each other.”
Whether they're playing it cool on purpose, or not, this story is once again mostly being reported in corporate media as an extension of Trump's longstanding grievances with anything he perceives as critical media coverage and the outlets that produce it; although boutique "progressive" websites and nonprofit media have been a little quicker to realize why this isn't just "Trump being Trump" anymore and how dangerous it is to assume our new American Mussolini lacks purpose in his actions here.
Frankly, I don't think it's an accident that in the very same speech Trump previewed loyalty investigations into Justice Department officials, and attempted to usurp the power of his Attorney General by declaring himself the country's "chief law enforcement officer," he declared liberal establishment media an active political arm of the opposition party, and accused them of both actively conspiring against him, and engaging in criminal activity. What does it mean when the "chief law enforcement officer" declares media critical of him "corrupt" and "illegal?" And how much more ominous is that meaning when its set against the backdrop of a US president celebrating his election as a victory against (what is now) his own Justice Department, while promising what sure sounds like legal investigations into DoJ lawyers and officials that dared to bring charges against him?
The obviously implication here is that Trump thinks the DoJ should target and prosecute media outlets that are critical of him, he has the right to order the department to do so because he's running the DoJ, and anyone who opposes that activity is likely to find themselves purged from the department at a minimum, and quite possibly prosecuted themselves. What many of the corporate media outlets likely to be targeted by Trump's assault on free speech rights and critical media coverage have passed off as a vengeful old man "playing the hits" is actually a fully formed operation to seize control of the American legal apparatus or at least the prosecution portion of it, redefine what is a crime, manufacture consent to target his enemies with the US Department of Justice, and threaten to punish or dispose of anyone who dares to get in his way over a silly little thing like "the law." Trump may have delivered it like a drunk racist grandpa, but his speech is clearly a calculated attempt by the president to drastically expand his own powers, and prosecute his fascist agenda - whether he's doing it for revenge or not (he is), is ultimately the *least* important factor here.
This then dovetails into the methods by which Trump is actually attempting to accomplish this fascist, anti-free speech bullshit; specifically the larger narrative of unreality the Trump regime is constructing day by day. Trump is working to equate critical media with his political opposition, his political opposition with protestors, and protestors with terrorists, while his larger regime takes actions against that opposition as if what Trump is suggesting here were already indisputable truth. I hate to keep bringing up literally Hitler, the Nazi Party, and the German Enabling Act of 1933, but students of history will gladly tell you that Hitler's playbook for transforming Germany into a autocratic one-party dictatorship looks an awful lot like exactly what Trump is doing here.
I just sat for almost 2 hours listening to absolutely nothing of value with Nicole Wallace in the background.
If #MSNBC wants to retain its viewers, it needs to start talking about the ramifications of what Trump and Musk are doing in specific terms.
The stock market went back up today in anticipation of the CR passing, which it did, and Trump supporters claim he's doing everything right.
I'm pretty much finished with TV "news".
I almost stroked out watching Sen Chuck Schumer on Chris Hayes' show. Every real argument Chris threw at him for Dems not voting for cloture Schumer ignored. Such a piece of shit. Chris asks "Hey, the Federal employees union says don't vote for cloture?" Chucky looked like he hadn't even considered the fact that the very employees who will be the most directly harmed want Dems to vote No. A disgrace.
Confession: I stopped watching #MSNBC completely after the cowards fired Joy Reid.
Ever wondered why the shows of Joy Reed, Alex Wagner, Katie Phang, Jonathan Capehart, and Ayman Mohyldin on #MSNBC were cancelled? What do all those people have in common?
Here is an explanation:
https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/why-did-msnbc-cancel-joy-reid
You don't have to agree ideologically or otherwise with someone in order to defend the need for their opinion to be heard. That's how democracies work. That's also how evolution works, and why mono-cultures die when the environment where they flourished changes.
Protest sign in DC "Every disaster movie begins with a Politician ignoring Science"
"The news channel has nixed or demoted their most progressive anchors, all of whom are people of color. These are the hosts who have drawn the most ire from Donald Trump’s online warriors, according to Dave Zirin of The Nation (2/28/25). They are also some of the few who were willing to air the network’s rare criticism of Israel. In their stead, MSNBC has elevated Democratic Party apparatchiks and a center-right never-Trumper. "
https://www.alternet.org/behind-msnbc-s-purge-of-its-most-progressive-anchors/
#MSNBC #MSM #GE
BTW, I now watch #BBCNews before 10 am: 100% boycotting Mika & Joe #MorningJoe . No #MSNBC before 10am! #Politics
[taps at Ultra podcast sign pinned to my profile for years]
https://universeodon.com/@SrRochardBunson/109563944381411780
“Eugene Daniels, a White House correspondent for Politico, is joining #MSNBC full-time as a host.
The Comcast Corp.-owned news channel announced Monday that Daniels, 36, will join the morning edition of “The Weekend,” a three-hour program airing Saturdays and Sundays. He will be joined by Washington Post journalist Jonathan Capehart and another co-host to be named soon.”
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2025-03-03/politico-veteran-eugene-daniels-joins-the-post-joy-reid-era-at-msnbc-as-weekend-co-host
I’m watching #MSNBC and a host asked what is the red line? When do people protest?
How low must Trump go?
I think Trump can go this low
If protests get large enough, #Trump will declare martial law. When or if the protests become violent, that’s when #Trump orders #Hegseth to order active duty military to fire on protesters.
#BunkerBoy #DictatorTrump wanted to shoot protesters in the legs during his first term. Now he doesn’t have guard rails.
Michael Che On Joy Reid & Lester Holt’s Departures From Network: “Well, NBC, Only One More To Go”
#News #BeyondtheGates #BlakeLively #ColinJost #DonaldTrump #JaneWickline #JoyReid #JustinBaldoni #LesterHolt #MarcelloHernandez #MichaelChe #MSNBC #NBC #SaturdayNightLive #SNL #VolodymyrZelenskyy #WeekendUpdate
"What has happened at MSNBC in the last several days is such an orgy of bad faith and bad ideas that it may be an industry record. Joy Reid? Gone. Jonathan Capehart? Lost his show. Alex Wagner? Lost her show and demoted. Ayman Mohyeldin? Lost his show."
~ Charles Pierce
#MSNBC #MediaFailure #capitulation
/1
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a63920939/msnbc-news-tv-shake-up-joy-reid/