Brett Sheffield (he/him)<p>In any process where you are talking about "stakeholders", if any of your stakeholders are not individual human beings, you need to think deeper.</p><p>A corporation is never a stakeholder.</p><p>The only reason to care about a corporation or other org is because of the real people that it might affect. The employees, perhaps. The customers, sometimes. *Those* are your stakeholders.</p><p>If one of your "stakeholders" is a trillion dollar corporation, you really are on the wrong path.</p><p><a href="https://chaos.social/tags/OSAID" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OSAID</span></a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/OpenSource" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenSource</span></a></p>
Recent searches
Search options
Administered by:
#osaid
0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Pleased to see that the #DigitalPublicGoods Alliance has found that the new OSI AI "definition" is not sufficient for its criteria, and that for #AI systems to be badged as a DPG, they will require all training data to be openly licensed.
#OpenSource #OpenSourceAI #OSAID
https://www.digitalpublicgoods.net/blog/the-role-of-open-data-in-ai-systems-as-digital-public-goods
Digital Public Goods Alliance - Promoting digital public goods to create a more equitable world · The Role of Open Data in AI systems as Digital Public Goods - Digital Public Goods AllianceAuthor: Liv Marte Nordhaug, Secretariat CEO, Digital Public Goods Alliance Over the last few years, there has been a surge in interest and adoption of generative artificial intelligence systems, and a corresponding interest in clarifying and delineating what open source should mean for AI and how to ensure AI serves the public interest. The DPGA
«Open Source Initiative legt KI-Definition vor:
Die Open Source Initiative hat festgelegt, welche Informationen KI-Anbieter offenlegen müssen, um tatsächlich Open-Source zu sein.»
Den Begriff Open-Source wird schon lange für kommerziellen Marketing missbraucht. Was dies nun wirklich ist und was nicht ist von @osi¹ detailiert aufgelistet und erklärt.
https://www.heise.de/news/Open-Source-Initiative-legt-KI-Definition-vor-9997180.html
1) https://opensource.org/licenses
heise online · Open Source Initiative legt KI-Definition vor
Continued thread
Comparing it to #OpenSource Software, the head of the #OSI says:
"#AI needs similar freedom to flourish."
Except that the Free Software & Open Source movements were (until recently!) not about the freedom of technology of its makers. It was all about the needs & liberation of those using that technology.
Now the very group self-charged with protecting OSS weaken it.
IMHO the disappointing #OSAID catastrophe is a great example of what happens when you de-center everyday people from strategy.
Open Steamroller Initiative
I posted two replies in the #OSI Discourse (https://discuss.opensource.org/). Both got stuck in "Pending" state, just to be dropped silently. Never became public, and no feedback towards me.
Might not have been the best comments, but this looks bad. Just as https://discuss.opensource.org/t/list-of-unaddressed-issues-of-osaid-rc1/650 does...
OSI DiscussOSI DiscussOpen Source Initiative Discuss
The questions from the @osi's session on the #OSAID last week at #OSSEU weren't captured well on video, so I transcribed them for you.
julia ferraioli · Questions from the Open Source AI Definition sessionWhat was discussed in the Q&A section of the Open Source Initiative’s session at Open Source Summit Europe 2024?
Replied in thread
Update. More on #OpenWashing and the complexity of defining #OpenSource #AI.
https://hackernoon.com/is-that-llm-actually-open-source-we-need-to-talk-open-washing-in-ai-governance
"The Open Source AI Definition (#OSAID) is still open for public review and feedback. If you’d like to participate in shaping the future of Open Source AI, you can submit comments."
hackernoon.comIs that LLM Actually "Open Source"? We Need to Talk About Open-Washing in AI Governance | HackerNoonIn this blog, we dive deep into the complexities of AI openness, focusing on how Open Source principles apply—or fail to apply—to Large Language Models (LLMs).
The OSI's draft Open Source AI Definition could harm open source by allowing non-reproducible data, enabling openwashing, and threatening transparency. https://chrisshort.net/data-deception-osis-open-source-ai-fallacy/ #opensource #AI #OSAID
chrisshort.net · Data Deception: OSI's Open Source AI FallacyThe OSI's draft Open Source AI Definition could harm open source by allowing non-reproducible data, enabling openwashing, and threatening transparency.